A fire burnt to ashes nearly 28 thatched hutments in the southern corner of Colony No. 5 on June 3. Inside a burning hutment, an eight-year-old boy got trapped and died. The district administration announced to give his mother and his father Rs 50,000 as ‘compensation’ (or sympathy). An administration is not designed to offer empathy.
When the UT officials came to ascertain the losses, men, who didn’t have anything anymore, spelt out the monetary losses: Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000. That’s all. A house, a life’s savings and belongings, all burnt, but worth Rs 25,000 only, a lost future less than the price of a second-hand motorcycle, a Blackberry mobile or a month’s BPO salary. That’s all.
As they wrote down the amount and took the signatures, the officials seemed apprehensive. They found the amounts too high. They know what the administration will give. They were chuckling inside and said, “Let them write what they feel like. At least this will give them a peace of mind”. The others agreed.
The men and the women sat on the burnt black ashen floor of what was yesterday a home in the city. They were proud people; bring up a life with their own labour, without any government help, piece by piece building a future made of routine and payments and small comforts. Burnt. In five minutes, by the fire riding the wind. No one knows where it came from but they know where it has left behind.
A daily wager, who carries bricks and mortar on his head on construction sites, and now carrying his child, said what he was wearing was all he had now.
The incident has activated power politics. BSP workers are at the forefront and are working in tandem with the administrative officials. The ward’s BSP councillor, also a migrant, is in UP now.
Hence, councillor of ward no. 23 is here with tarpaulins and helpers. In times of calamity, political ambitions run on one basic premise: the victims will always remember who came to their help, who did not; workers of which party were active and which were not; who offered real help and who offered assurances.
(It is the unacknowledged cycle of democracy—making the exploiters accountable to the exploited. The exploiter and the exploited retain their respective positions. Democracy has only interlinked them in a post-colonial way.)
There are provisions for compensation due to fire in the law of the land: tragedy due to official negligence is made intrinsic to official compensation. It is as if the state preempts its own failures and also a way to hide it after showing it to everyone; in a way it’s failing twice and smiling over it.
There was a murmur that this payback will be somewhere between Rs 2,500 and Rs 5,000, after the officials ascertain the exact amount of the losses per household.
The officials know the exact losses; they had seen the ashes. But their rational thinking has been lost in the labyrinth of spiral rules, monotony and power. They have been enslaved to the point that they think of guarding the state’s money against its own citizens for the saved money to be used otherwise (in salary hikes maybe or in developmental projects).
Their thinking is not designed to ask for a uniform distribution of Rs 50,000 to each household irrespective of the losses since they will never believe what a man without a home says. But they can think of building a memorial costing Rs 2 crore in the memory of a leader who had never asked for it.